Home
LazyBastard.Com
Bio Addendum (Books)
1997
&1998
-
A Supposedly Fun Thing I'll Never Do Again, David
Foster Wallace 06/02/97
-
The University, Bentley Little, 2/98
-
The Hellfire Club, Peter Straub, 2/98
-
The Mailman, Bentley Little, 2/98
-
Mucho Mojo, Joe R. Lansdale, 2/98
-
Savage Season, Joe R. Lansdale, 2/98
-
The Two Bear Mambo, Joe R. Lansdale, 2/98
-
Bad Chili, Joe R. Lansdale
-
The Totem, David Morrell
-
Midnight's Lair, Richard Laymon
-
Chaingang, Rex Miller
-
Jackals, Charles Grant
-
Stone Junction, Jim Dodge
-
I also started the horror "classic" Erebus by
Shaun Hutson and just had to give it up. In fact, I should really
do some reviews of these damn things but the horror field appears to have
gotten in some sort of rape/castration fetish that it can't get out of
(particularly castration by fellatio). As far as I can tell, some
authors (Laymon and Little) power their work almost exclusively by these
fears. I have a couple of problems with this, not least that it's
exploitative. The whole castration/fellatio scenes tend to be powered
by not so much men's recurring fear that a woman is going to bite it off
then and there but by the writer's decision to get a bit of foreplay and
sex writing in there before the deed. Likewise, many of the rape
scenes that seem to occur not long after the victim has some sort of breathlessly
described fantasy. We're not supposed to be horrified, we're supposed to
be titillated, and the horror is just thrown in there to justify the sex.
Although, because it pops up so much in Little's work, and he seems sincerely
interested in writing large, ambitious horror novels, I'll give him the
benefit of the doubt and acknowledge that these thngs are true sources
of horror and anxiety that he's interested in working in. This brings
me to the next problem; it seems to miss the whole point of horror
literature in general and, I would submit, the point of literature altogether.
Literature is even more symbolic than I think the majority of its composers
recognize, and I'll say off the cuff that the great majority of horror
literature concerns itself metaphorically with the anxieties related to
rape, castration, and, particularly, sexual disease as a result of violation.
Check out the enduring archetypes of vampires and werewolves, wherein the
victims must struggle with unwanted violation, fearful flashbacks, a feeling
of alienation from others after (along with numerous comments from their
friends that they're not the same), and actual transformation into the
monster after the fact. (Is it any wonder that we readily accept
that many rapists and sexual abusers were themselves raped and sexually
abused after growing up with vampire and werewolf movies in which the tendencies
of the attacker are transmitted to the attacked through attack?)
If you want to deal with the complex psychological problems of identifying
with the perpetrator of the violator and look at the empowerment through
violation narcissist fantasy, you go with the vampire myth. If you
want a furthering of the victim-as-unclean-and-forever-after-tainted self-loathing
fantasy, you go with the werewolf myth. These are just two horror archetypes,
and I think they deal with the issues and anxieties of rape and sexual
disease much more succinctly and entertainingly than a rape episode in
a horror novel; it's very rare for the raped or castrated character to
survive the attack, for one thing, thus really missing a very important
stage of the rape or castration anxiety; the aftereffects. Also,
I maintain that literature works on these anxieties at a symbolic level
to keep its audience. Direct works of literature about these things
have a real rough path to trod as, unless there is an original approach
or an overwhelming intelligence focussing on the subject, people find it
too depressing to really continue and put it down saying, "Why do I want
to read all this? I know all this stuff, already." Or as, years
ago, my date said while restlessly squirming her way through the movie
Dolores Claiborne, "yeah, yeah, life is horrible, blah, blah, blah.
This is boring. Let's go." I chalked this up as just general insensitivity
on her part until I realized, long after the fact, that such insenstivity
was coming from the mouth of a survivor of long-term sexual abuse and incest.
Anyway, so my point is that the rape/castration/disease anxieties being
used as "spine-tinglers" in horror novels tend to miss the point and dead-end
the novel, if not the whole genre, pretty quickly.
-
Brotherhood of the Rose, David Morrell 6/98
-
About A Boy, Nick Hornsby 6/98
-
All Heads Turn When the Hunt Goes By, John Farris,
6/98
-
Fiends, John Farris 7/98
-
The Regulators, Richard Bachman 7/98, followed
right by
-
Desperation, Stephen King 7/98
-
The Talented Mr. Ripley, Patricia Highsmith 7/98
-
Ripley Underground, Patricia Highsmith 8/98
-
Ripley's Game, Patricia Highsmith 8/98
-
Vampire$, John Steakley 9/98
-
Brain Storm, Richard Dooling 10/98
-
Torso, Steven Nickel 10/98
-
The Rape of Nanking, Iris Chang, 10/98
-
The Store, Bentley Little, 11/03/98
-
Rumble Tumble Joe R. Lansdale, 11/16/98
-
Voodoo in New Orleans, Robert Tallant, 11/28/98
-
The Wasp Factory, Iain Banks, 12/04/98
All material on these pages is © 1997-99 by Jeff Lester.
With the exception of non-profit distribution, all other rights are reserved.